Friday, February 15, 2013

Love & Rage



4th Sunday after the Epiphany; Yr. C, February 3, 2013
Jeremiah 1:41-10; Psalm 71:1-6; 1 Corinthians 13:1-13; Luke 4:21-30
Sermon preached at St. Stephens Episcopal Church

            On Sunday, March 7, 1965 600 civil rights marches headed toward Montgomery from Selma, AL.  They were staging a peaceful march in support of black rights.  They had only walked six blocks out of Selma when they were stopped at the Edmund Pettus Bridge.  State and local police refused to let them pass over the bridge and ordered them to disperse.  The group stopped as one of their leaders made a request.  Hosea Williams, of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, asked if he might “have a word” with the officer in charge.   Major Cloud refused to speak to him and gave the group a two-minute warning to disperse.  Williams asked again, “Can I have a word?”  As Senator John Lewis explains it, after a minute or so, the major ordered the troops into position and they advanced on the marchers with tear gas, bull whips and billy clubs.  That was Bloody Sunday.[1]

            Senator John Lewis was among the leaders on that march and was standing at the front of the group.  As troopers rushed in he was hit twice in the head with a billy club.  The first blow knocked him to the ground.  He was hit the second time as he was trying to get up.  The crowd of law enforcement officers at the bridge that day weren’t alone.  They had been joined by a posse of others.  I think they expected a fight.  I think they thought that once the blows started to fall, the marchers would fight back, and they would need all the reinforcements they could get.  But that didn’t happen.  The marchers didn’t fight back.  There was no riot. 
            Isn’t that how Jesus responded to the violence in our gospel story today.  He walked through it.  We pick up the story where we left off last week.  Jesus is still in the synagogue after having read from the scroll.  After telling those gathered that the reading had been fulfilled in their hearing.  Everyone spoke well of Jesus.  They liked him.  They knew him.  They start to think about what he’s told them.  Wasn’t he Joseph’s son, the carpenter’s son?  Talking about him the way we might talk about Abby Wambach after the women’s soccer team won the gold medal at the Olympics.  But we’ve watched Abby Wambach grow into an amazing soccer player.  We don’t know what the people saw of Jesus as he grew up in Nazareth.  We don’t hear about that part of his life.  Could they have predicted this announcement coming from him?  Had he showed such promise as a child?  Might they be wondering if this was really the same Jesus they knew?  Maybe wondering if what they’ve been hearing is really true?  It seems like Jesus suspects this kind of a response, because he doesn’t stop talking.
He tells them, And you will say, Do here also in your hometown the things that we have heard you did at Capernaum.’”  He thinks that they will expect to see some of the “miracles” he’s performed in other places … healings, exorcisms, anything to prove that it’s all true.  But Jesus  isn’t going to satisfy their curiosity.  Instead, he tells them that he hasn’t come to help them.  In fact, if they look back at their own salvation story, they’ll discover that God has often sent prophets to those outside the Jewish circle … to a widow in Zarephath, to a Syrian officer. 
It would be one thing if the congregation became annoyed, like anyone who is refused something she might want.  It would be different if they had just gone away angry because they weren’t getting something they felt they deserved.  But the crowd in the synagogue becomes enraged.  They turn into a violent mob.  The first three definitions for rage in Webster’s dictionary contain the word violent, or violence.  Some might argue that the Greek word used in this instance could be translated differently, but there’s no arguing that violence was involved.  They drive Jesus out of town, and lead him to the brow of a hill so they can hurl him off a cliff!
I don’t get the feeling that Jesus meant to incite a riot.  He was just stating the truth.  A truth that is our truth as well.  Jesus came for those who did not already know God, to reveal God’s presence to them.  It’s kind of ironic to me, that the ones who already knew God could be so easily enraged by the One who was called to reveal God to others … simply because he was willing to cross cultural boundaries.  But then I am reminded of the violent response to the marchers at Selma, and I remember that we do not like to cross boundaries.  Our love has limits, limits we may not recognize consciously.    When those outside our comfort zones, those on the fringes of society, are offered something that doesn’t benefit us individually, do we feel put upon? Cheated?  Burdened?  Do we focus on what it will cost us, and forget to consider what it could mean for the one being helped?  Sometimes.  Just look at the news.  Some of us even get enraged enough to stop peaceful marchers from crossing a bridge, and we beat them with billy clubs.  Not quite the same is driving someone to the edge of a cliff to toss them over, but pretty close. 
Jesus walks through it all.  He doesn’t get sucked in.  He doesn’t contribute to it by fighting back.  He goes on his way.  He leaves the group to struggle with what’s been said.  He does not strike back. 
Let me be clear about what I am NOT saying.  I am not saying that we should never fight for something, or someone.  There are lots of things to fight for, and there are times we need to step in to stop harm being done; but rarely have I seen rage produce a positive result.  Acting on rage is akin to giving in to insanity.  When we are enraged, we are out of our minds.  You cannot reason with rage.  You can only deflect it.  You can let it blow by you.  You can stand with the defenseless who are plunked in the midst of it, but you cannot overpower it with anything but your own rage.   Don’t go down that road.
The marchers in Selma must have felt rage rising in them.  They must have felt betrayed and humiliated, but they did not give into it.  Many did not have the power to literally walk through the beatings without being harmed, but spiritually they did.  They remained committed to a peaceful march.  They did not respond with violence.  If they had, I think the whole movement would have lost its power.  It would have lost momentum, especially from many white supporters. 
Two weeks after Bloody Sunday, Martin Luther King, Jr. joined a group of walkers for a symbolic March from Selma to the bridge.  Several weeks later, after receiving protection from the court, a group of several thousand began the long march from Selma to Montgomery.  They walked an average 12 miles per day, and slept on farm fields at night.  By the end of the five day march, 25,000 people had joined the walk.  Several months later, President Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act into law.  Peace in the face of rage produced those amazing results.  What courage those civil rights leaders had.
The Church exists for those who do not already know God, to be living icons of Christ’s loving presence in the world.  Surely, we support and love one another because we belong to this particular church, but the challenge to all of us is to support and love those we do not yet know … who may be looking for God … who may be waiting to meet Jesus on the outside in a world that is filled with rage. 
The Episcopal Diocese of Rochester in cooperation with The Gandhi Institute is participating in A Season of Nonviolence this Lent.     It offers us all the opportunity to explore our relationship with violence during this season of repentance and reflection.  The Season calls us to participate in daily exercises and educational events to increase peace and understanding in our communities.  Though A Season for Nonviolence has not been intentionally practiced in our faith tradition, it is very much in keeping with our faith in God and our love of Christ that leads us to the conclusion that nonviolence is a life-giving and essential element of our faith journey in the church.  I invite you to participate in this multi-faith effort, an effort also officially recognized and proclaimed by the City of Rochester and Monroe County.
Take time in the coming weeks to reflect on what tempts you into rage, and how love might call you to act differently.  Jesus did not walk away from the troubles of his time, and neither should we.  Jesus walked with the suffering.  Jesus offered hope to those who were oppressed.  Jesus resisted culturally accepted violence that others could or would not … we can too.  May the love of God lead us all to the peace  that passes all understanding.

Amen. 



[1] Confrontations for Justice.  John Lewis – March from Selma to Montgomery, “Bloody Sunday,” 1965 on Eyewitness: American Witness from the American Archives, www.archives.gov/exhibits/eyewitness/html.php?section=2.

No comments:

Post a Comment